A Weberian Force For the Generalized Newtonian Force

There are more parallels between Newton's force and the Weberian force of electrodynamics than meets the eye. Newton derived his inverse square law from the centrifugal force


where $F_s$ is the force directed at the source, $v$ the velocity and $\varrho$, the radius of curvature. Newton then introduced Kepler's II,


to obtain


Newton developed, early in his carrier an expression for the radius of curvature, which reads


although he did not write it in this form. From the way we have written the centrally directed force,

it is very strange that Newton didn't consider a centripetal force varying as the inverse cube of the distance. Introducing the transform $u=1/r$, the force becomes


In this form, it is appear that the equation of the trajectory,


equivalent to $\varrho\sin^3\alpha=\mbox{const}$, gives his inverse square law for the particular conic section of an ellipse. But, this is not the only conic section that can be obtained, and will explain the dual force laws for the magic pairs


that we have discussed in previous blogs. The first pair is the Hooke-Newton pair, while the other two are unknown. This is where out generalized force law comes in, that is not limited to these pairs, but, moreover, to the elusive inverse cubic law as well.

First, we establish that the force expression is conservative, by being able to derive it from a potential

$$W=\frac{1-(d\ln r/d\theta)^2}{2r^2},$$

much like Weber derived his force. The difference here is that the azimuthal angle $\theta$ replaces the current elements, $ids$ and $i'ds'$ in Weber's force:

$$F_w=\frac{ids\cdot i'ds'}{r^2}\left(1+2r\frac{\partial^2 r}{\partial s\partial s'}-\frac{\partial r}{\partial s}\frac{\partial r}{\partial s'}\right).$$

The angular dependencies in the generalized Newtonian force are therefore analogous to Ampere's law of which Weber's force synthesizes with Coulomb's force.

It is readily apparent that the generalized Newtonian force can derived from the Euler-Lagrange equation

$$\frac{d}{d\theta}\frac{\partial W}{\partial(dr/d\theta)}-\frac{\partial W}{\partial r}=F_s/L^2.$$

Second, we see that Einstein's equation for the advance of the perihelion of Mercury,


This corresponds to an inverse quartic force, and corresponds to a cardoid,


Third, the inverse seventh corresponds to a Cassini oval, and, in particular the lemniscate,

$$r=\surd\sin 2\theta.$$

This turns out give the force,


one of the magic trio, since


Finally, the unstable spirals, $r=a/\theta$,and $r=a\theta$, the logarithmic and Archimedes spirals, respectively, correspond to the inverse cubic


and the combination of inverse cubic and fifth,


respectively. The latter belongs to one of the magic trio, but seems to have no problems to appear with the solo inverse cubic.

According to de Sitter's appraisal of GR, "gravity is not a force." This, in essence, relegates gravity to the time dimension which it has no right of being there. That is why Einstein's determination of the "gap" in the numerical value of the advance of the perihelion, was just that---gap fitting. Here we can appreciate it as the result of the combination of the inverse square and inverse quartic forces. We will have more to say about this in coming blogs.